On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:00:24 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:

>I am 99% certain that the 100 character limitation has always been a JCL 
>restriction, not a "linkage" restriction. Two consenting programs can pass 
>whatever they want in R1, including a pointer to a "long" character string.
> 
OK.  I'll add in my RCF, "Charles is 99% certain ..."  If callers are 
unauthorized, no integrity
violation is possible.  If callers are authorized, they can be trusted.

TSO CALL enforces a 100-character limit syntactically, and does not support 
PARMDD.
But the Guide ought to mention TSO, not with the "mainly" cop out.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Gilmartin
>Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:35 AM
>
>In Program Management: User's Guide and Reference" I read:
>"[LONGPARM] applies mainly to programs that are invoked using a JCL EXEC
>statement or a z/OS UNIX EXECMVS callable service."

-- 
gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to