Interesting business model. <g> Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Robert Prins Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 3:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: COBOL - z/OS 2.1 vs 2.4 https://www.fiverr.com/devoutoccamist/answer-your-questions-regarding-zos-and-the-mainframe-3a9c And are you going to share the proceeds. Do you by any chance work for a company that provides support to companies that have cancelled their support contracts with IBM? Just asking, I've opted not to sign a contract with them... Robert On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 13:24, Crusty Old Guy <devoutoccam...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have a client with loadmods that are ancient. Some are very ancient. > All of those loadmods are currently running under z/OS 2.1. > Under z/OS 2.4, some of these loadmods are abending. Others are creating > incorrect output. > > What could account for this behavior? What has changed between 2.1 & 2.4? > > Regards, > Crusty Old Guy > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Robert AH Prins robert(a)prino(d)org The hitchhiking grandfather <https://prino.neocities.org/index.html> Some REXX code for use on z/OS <https://prino.neocities.org/zOS/zOS-Tools.html> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
