Hi Al! Did it take into account Sync Rem Copy (PPRC and the like)? I don't even remember if PPRC had been released back then.
Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: Al Sherkow <a...@sherkow.com> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu, Date: 04/21/2013 07:50 PM Subject: Re: SMF42 subtype 6 interpretation Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> Yes the times are in uses of 128 microseconds. If you are a member of CMG or are willing to register on their website you can find my 1998 paper "DOES YOUR INSTALLATION HAVE HALF-SECOND I/O RESPONSE TIME? (A Closer Examination of Disconnect Time)". I believe that paper first explored how to use the SMF 42-6 data to better understand response time for cache hits and cache misses. Hard to believe that was 15 years ago that I did that work. Al Sherkow ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
