Hadn't considered that. Based on what the outsourcer has advised us I doubt this has even crossed their mind.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023, 6:19 PM Timothy Sipples <sipp...@sg.ibm.com> wrote: > The only other thing I can think of is that some operators (some > outsourcers for example) might not have — or know how to perform — capacity > measurement, planning, chargeback accounting (ugh!), or contractual > arrangements when running the CFCC on general purpose processors (CPs). > Those are not a technical limitations. You/they can do all of that for CF > workloads straightforwardly. But those "technobusiness" factors might > explain some reticence if you're observing any. > > — — — — — > Timothy Sipples > Senior Architect > Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and Cybersecurity > IBM zSystems/LinuxONE, Asia-Pacific > sipp...@sg.ibm.com > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
