Linda Chui wrote: >My colleague validated this issue. Yes, this is a documentation error.
>The default should be the same as the ARCH option description >mentioned (page 63). We have notified our content editor to >update/correct our docs. >Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Thank you! Does that default change periodically? I suppose it must-is it always such that the default supports the oldest currently supported hardware? What we don't want to do is upgrade the compile and break our product for our customers. We can explicitly specify ARCH(10) now, but then WE have to remember to update it. If the design is to always support what IBM supports, we can stop worrying about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
