On Mon, 1 May 2023 17:02:23 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote: >(Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and the assembler list) > >...; what isn't clear is whether there's any downside to it beyond the >unlikely case that you decide to have a function of your own named asm or >__asm or __asm__. Is there? > I believe the ANSI standard reserves names beginning with "__" for the implementation. However a FOSS provider whom I once scolded for using using such a name replied, "I *am* the implementation!"
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
