Seymour J Metz wrote, in part: >> AC is meaningless in a Unicode context.
>In the context of a Unicode code point, "AC" is a perfectly >unambiguous abbreviation for U+00AC. In any other context,not so much. No, its not: is that a byte xAC? Is this big- or little-endian? Thats why the U+ syntax exists. And re which page has the NOT sign at xaa: >See, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP850#Character_set Oy. That one shows that somebody just didnt think it would ever matterwhich makes sense, Microsoft was tiny, who knew! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
