good point. I am getting to be a bit of an LE bigot because I like to use C (IBM C) subroutines in my HLASM. I don't have a C license, but I am allowed to use the C subroutines along with the other LE subroutines from PL/I and FORTRAN. I prefer to be "lazy" and use IBM's (et al.) subroutine library in preference to an RYO. At least whenever it is "reasonable" (to me). Definitely need to LE enable my HLASM in that case. Wish I could afford a C/C++ compiler.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Thomas David Rivers <riv...@dignus.com>wrote: > John McKown wrote: > > >> I would _strongly_ suggest that you take the time and effort to LE enable >> your assembler subroutines if you're going to use them with an LE main >> routine such as C or COBOL. >> > That's assuming you're using IBM (LE) C. You can do OpenMVS > programming with the Dignus C runtime and not use LE. > Using this approach, assembler routines are not LE-enabled. > > - Dave Rivers - > > -- > riv...@dignus.com Work: (919) 676-0847 > Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
