zCX has been out there for a few years now, how much is it being used for real work? Has is really taken business away from other platforms? Unless that happens it will just be another technical curiosity.
mkk On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:33:12 +0000, kekronbekron <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think K8s is the USS of yesteryear >Sad noises... I would like to see zOS native containers integrated directly to >WLM instead. >WLM is literally the workload manager. >It may not make sense for it to do everything k8s does, but could maybe do >what consul or docker swarm does? > >Me stomach turns seeing OpenShift inside zCX. >How many layers of faking do we need? PR/SM -> (maybe) zVM -> zOS -> zCX -> >container. >zOS security/network configuration ... zCX security/network configuration ... >OpenShift/k8s/containers security/network configuration ... contained >application's security/network configuration > >It would be fun to see zCX "unwrapped" and presented as Linux System Services >instead. >Like OMVS STC is to USS, zCX-renamed could be that to LSS. > >- KB > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
