And, if you were offered a job that paid $100K, would you expect to receive 
$102,400?  

=
=
 > Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 18:08:28 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: OT - What is the proper term for "K" notation?
> To: [email protected]
> 
> Shmuel,
> 
> I always used K, with the understanding it was 1024 ...if you write assembler 
> a base register used to cover 4K ,,4096 bytes ....it's all through IBM 
> manuals as far as I know ...unless your doing baseless.....
> 
> Scott ford
> www.identityforge.com
> from my IPAD
> 
> 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
> 
> 
> On May 3, 2013, at 3:58 PM, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > In <[email protected]>, on 05/02/2013
> >   at 09:16 PM, Scott Ford <[email protected]> said:
> > 
> >> Ok guys ..I understand the science here but I learned a K = 1024
> >> bytes
> > 
> > Back in the 1960's people who used K when they meant 1024 unsderstood
> > that they were misusing it. In the same epoch I also learned that K
> > was 512, which was an even worse misuse. 
> > 
> >> am I too old school .....
> > 
> > No; were you old schjool then you would use K as 1000 exclusively.
> > 
> > -- 
> >     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
> >     Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
> > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
                                          
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to