IMS was written in the 1960s for NASA Apollo parts management. On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 08:14 Crawford Robert C (Contractor) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, I worked in a shop that had both and I can tell you CICS is way > more flexible, modern and performed better. > > I will give you this: IMS is a great piece of 90's technology. > > Robert Crawford > Abstract Evolutions LLC > (210) 913-3822 > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf > Of Schmitt, Michael > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 11:43 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [EXT] Ars Technica: The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it > survives > > Ars Technica published a deep-dive explainer of modern IBM mainframes: > > > https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/the-ibm-mainframe-how-it-runs-and-why-it-survives/ > > > Iād quibble with the application server topic that talks about CICS with > no mention of IMS/TM. CICS is to IMS as Windows 3.1 is to Windows 10. š > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
