> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 04:04:02 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> I see no reason to repeatedly give the same answer
Again with non-answers. I've only asked you to identify the lie in this one
Email so how did you repeat an answer you never gave. If you stay out of my way
then I will stay out of your way. This must include dismissive statements as if
they are fact.
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 04:04:02 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
<[email protected]> wrote:
I see no reason to repeatedly give the same answer to a rude and arrogant
hypocrite with delusions of adequacy.
And yes, I knew that you were a putz.
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Jon
Perryman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 6:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Ignorant z/OS question
> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 03:39:46 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> I'm saying that you are lying about what we disagree about.
You said I lied again in that Email. Your non-answer is not an answer. What
specifically in that Email is "disagree about" that is a lie? I don't want your
respect but I will not accept disrespect from See-more Putz.
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 03:39:46 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm saying that you are lying about what we disagree about.
When you launch gratuitous ad hominem attacks on me then you have forfeited any
claim to respect.
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Jon
Perryman <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2023 6:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Ignorant z/OS question
> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 01:11:05 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> You are repeating the same old lie.
What lie are you saying I'm repeating? z/VM console 3215 for screen scraping?
Are you saying you asked a question in trying to understand my point? Are you
saying as your message didn't imply, it's inconceivable my I point may have
merit? Are you saying your last message was in any way an attempt to show any
type of respect for my opinion? Are you saying that your response was not
intended to deny all possibility that you could be wrong and I may have a valid
point.
What is the lie? See-more Putz proving you can't fix stupid. Is this really the
direction you want to take this?
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 01:11:05 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
<[email protected]> wrote:
You are repeating the same old lie. In fact, I am aware that I sumetimes err
and I have thanked people one this list for correcting errors that I have made.
Can you honestly make the same claim?
I will consistently respect opinions for others when they have a basis in fact.
I, however, do not suffer fools gladly and do not respect the opinions of those
who deliberately misrepresent what is in contention.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Jon
Perryman [[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2023 4:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Ignorant z/OS question
> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 09:04:58 AM PDT, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> WTF? It has nothing to do with screen scraping. It has to do with addresses
> and device types matching.
Once again Seymour fails to ask even one basic question to determine if there
is any merit. Seymour's incompetence once again demands I must be wrong because
it's inconceivable that anyone can be more knowledgeable than he.
z/OS 3270 to z/VM 3215 CONSOLE to a SECUSER running z/VM PROP to capture the
3270 data stream. Only a couple more pieces of the puzzle to figure out and you
can quickly prototype a screen scraper. If someone wants to see 3270 data
stream, they have easy access through z/VM 3215 console. Device mismatching has
it's uses.
Seymour, in the future, do you plan on respecting opinions from others or will
you continue to insist that your opinion is the only one with true merit and
that you can't possibly be wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
