OAM is obsolete. Remember mainframe based optical drives? That's what OAM was for. It interfaced with DB2 which was where it kept it's catalog. OTIS was in there too, somewhere.
Ignore it. I do with no problems. On May 6, 2013 4:04 PM, "Mark Pace" <[email protected]> wrote: > We recently removed our 3494 tape library. So we stopped using DFRMM and > OAM. > > Today we are installing a Luminex virtual tape system. I've recreated all > the tape stuff in SMS, DC, SG, SC and library. > > When I go to start OAM I get message > CBR0054I OAM has initialized without object tape support. > > *Explanation:* OAM has initialized without a valid OAM=XX keyword in either > | the OAM PROCLIB member or on the START OAM operator command. Object tape > | processing has been bypassed. > > This is the same proc we used in the past. I've never issued OAM=xx before, > not can I find any documentation on what that means. > > Has any one seen this before and have an explanation of what it means? > > > > > -- > The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent > Mainline’s positions or opinions > > Mark D Pace > Senior Systems Engineer > Mainline Information Systems > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
