> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 10:46:49 AM PDT, Steve Beaver wrote:
> I'm thinking that a small group of people write a SPC-for linux/unix.
I'm guessing that SPC is Systems Programming C. Unix currently doesn't need SPC
because it doesn't have built-in robust features like z/OS. For instance, you
don't have exit points in the kernel that give you access to the system. Only
the kernel developers need to know the restrictions. For instance, when a load
is not permitted. SPC was developed specifically for z/OS with considerations
for restrictions you may encounter.
On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 10:46:49 AM PDT, Steve Beaver
<[email protected]> wrote:
I have had a happy because of the discussion if VI and emacs.
I'm thinking that a small group of people write a SPC-for linux/unix. Now
I will be the first to say I don't know C, C++, C .net or any of those
languages
But I sure can test the product as it begins ALPHA testing
Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
