On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:32:33 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>Hi Gil,
>You said: "...I recall seeing in days of your ..." My? ... My what? {;}-> ?
>I think that you meant "yore" instead of "your", n'est-ce pas?
>
The other, very similar, comment I received was off-list. I regret that
I provided an enticement to drift. I hope further replies will address
not my style, but my substance (which, admittedly, addr3essed the
style of IBM's documentation.) I corrected the spelling in the quoted
text.
>On 2023-09-11 14:21, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> In the JCL Ref, I recall seeing in days of [yore] a matrix of mutually
>> exclusive parameters on the DD statement. I no longer find it; instead
>> for various parameters see:
>> Relationship to other parameters
>> Do not code the following parameters with the ... parameter:
>>
>> Does this mean they're mutually exclusive? Earlier, I see:
>> • If you add a parameter that is mutually exclusive with a parameter
>> on a procedure statement, the override operation automatically
>> nullifies the procedure parameter.
>>
>> Did the matrix just become too big to print? Should there be a statement
>> somewhere that "Do not code the following parameters with" implies
>> "mutually exclusive", or is it sometimes merely advisory?
--
Happy New Year,
gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
