On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 06:16:59PM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: > I did schedule the irb in the ikjeft01 TCB against Seymour's advice > for a return code of zero from schedirb
There are likely many ways to do something like what you are trying to do and the IRB idea likely wasn't close to the best, however: * if you have a test system at your disposal where a dump or crash won't hurt others * and you have the time to do a bit of exploring and learning I don't see it as bad, unless you don't learn from it. > However the TMP Estae issued an SDUMP Which is what I'd expect if the code the IRB tried to run had any sort of problem (program check? abend?). The resulting abend will be passed to that tasks (IKJEFT01) ESTAE and most likely it has no idea what to do about it. So it took a dump and likely got the RB chain for that task cleaned up (or terminated the task?). > I guess it didn't like me scheduling an irb in its TCB No, my best guess is that IKJEFT01 has no idea anyone would do such a thing. And if the IRB code ran and terminated normally the IRB would go away and IKJEFT01 would still be there and would never know. Go read the dump and figure out what happened... Find the IJKEFT01 TCB and it's RB chain. Does it show an IRB on the chain? Where do the PSWs in the RBs on the chain point? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
