So nothing more than that. IMHO it doesn't seem too worthwhile in most environments. Thanks however.
Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected] ------- Original Message ------- On Friday, September 22nd, 2023 at 3:45 PM, Mark Zelden <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:30:31 +0000, Mark Jacobs [email protected] > wrote: > > > I know what the risks are in moving the ASVT into 31 bit storage, but I > > don't see any benefits. Can someone enlighten me? > > > > Mark Jacobs > > > Isn't it obvious? Slightly more 24-bit storage for programs needing below the > line private. > And I do mean slightly. It is about 4K per 1000 entries. I guess you would > add up > MAXUSER and RSVNONR to know what you are using now. Each ASVT entry is > 4 bytes in SQA <16M, so less SQA means more private. > > Best Regards, > > Mark > -- > Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS > ITIL v3 Foundation Certified > mailto:[email protected] > Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
