On Wed, 15 May 2013 11:27:47 -0500, John McKown wrote: >Rather than being signed, IBM _could_ move the epoch back.
Remember when some shops would post here every time the clocks changed back in the fall? They were running with local=GMT and would have to keep their IMS systems down for an hour so that they wouldn't have duplicate time stamps. If IBM were to change the epoch, customers would have to keep them down for a lot longer.... -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
