The reason it hung was when I started to debug the recovery I had NOT linked it 
REUS 
The way I debug I do a TEST command 
For the driving code 

LOAD the recovery module and do a breakpoint at +0

Thus everytime the module was invoked a new copy was loaded 
Sorry 
> On Nov 29, 2023, at 11:32 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Jon P wrote (somewhat tongue in cheek)
> <snip>
> When did IBM start creating minor CDE's for each csect in a load module?
> </snip>
> 
> We all know that the answer is "never" and (to the unasked question) "never 
> will".
> 
> It sounds like the idea is not to find information about the program that 
> blew up but rather about the program that called the program (perhaps more 
> than one level of indirection away) that blew up. That could be dangerous to 
> do in a recovery routine (whose primary goal is to fix while doing no harm, 
> and whose secondary goal is to capture diagnostic data, similarly while doing 
> no harm).
> 
> SDWANAME, when it's not SDWARBAD, tries to find the module name.  PRB's might 
> have an associated CDE (an example of a case where a PRB does not have an 
> associated CDE is the PRB created for SYNCH). If the abending RB is a PRB, 
> RTM uses that RB's RBCDE1 field (when non-zero) to locate the CDE and extract 
> the name. For an IRB, it uses CSVQUERY based on the entry point address in 
> the RB.
> 
> The other posters have mentioned a lot of situations that are not possible to 
> deal with if using intended interfaces. Sure you could do a CSVQUERY for 
> JPALPA and even a NUCLKUP. If you do such things you ought to make sure you 
> have nested recovery to handle the case where a problem occurs within those 
> routines. And a "general recovery routine" would have to cover the 
> cross-memory case where the current primary is not the home address space 
> (RB's are in the home address space).
> 
> Joe R started this whole discussion with a point about TSO TEST hanging. I 
> proved that it does not always do so, so Joe needs to consider the 
> possibility that he's doing something in his test environment that is causing 
> this to happen.
> 
> Peter Relson
> z/OS Core Technology Design
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to