The last sentence of the requirement reads,
"I believe IBM needs a new approach to the handling of these situations. Either 
there needs to be a formally agreed process for having 2 or more master 
catalogs in a sysplex, or there needs to be a way for VSAM data sets to be 
“multiply-owned” by more than one catalog."

I think this includes a "dual MCAT solution".
Lennie

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: 29 November 2023 18:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Page Datasets in User Catalog

Lennie,
I won't support it, because I don't want it. In my opinion it is bad approach.
BTW: there is quite new feature
F CATALOG,RESTART(new.mcat.dsn)
which I like.

As an alternative I would consider some solution like dual MCAT - similar to 
dual RACF db, or Db2 log.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland



W dniu 29.11.2023 o 19:27, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw pisze:
> Radoslaw and others,
> Please consider supporting my idea on the ideas portal.
>
> Better support for multiple master catalogs in a sysplex.
> https://ibm-z-hardware-and-operating-systems.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/ZOS-I-3890
>
> Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
> https: //rsclweb.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List<[email protected]>  On Behalf Of 
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Sent: 29 November 2023 15:42
> To:[email protected]
> Subject: Re: Page Datasets in User Catalog
>
> W dniu 29.11.2023 o 04:56, Mark Zelden pisze:
>> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:20:51 -0600, Jon Perryman<[email protected]>   
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:35:13 +0000, Seymour J Metz<[email protected]>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> I suspect that there was a game of telegraph, whereby crucial details got 
>>>> lost.
>>>>
>>>> It is normal to allocate page datasets in a user catalog that will 
>>>> eventually be used as a master catalog.
>>>> I'm suspicious of the claim that z/OS can use  a page dataset that is not 
>>>> in its own master catalog, but I can't rule it out.
>>> There are definitely crucial details lost. Page and swap are special 
>>> datasets. For instance, a page dataset can be in multiple catalogs (I think 
>>> using recatalog).
>> Pagespace can be in multiple catalogs (which should be a master to the
>> system that is using it) via RECATALOG.  I think at one time it had to
>> have a HLQ of PAGE or SYS1 but my memory is fuzzy on that part.  I know for 
>> a long time the HLQ doesn't matter at all  for pagespace and it could still 
>> be in
>> multiple catalogs.   This also applies to swapspace and VSAM linear ZFS that 
>> is indirectly cataloged.
>> Any SYS1 VSAM dataset can be in multiple catalogs via recatalog.
>>
>> Don't ask me where this is documented now. :)  I'm guessing "DFSMS managing 
>> catalogs".
>
> I dare to correct the above considerations.
> 1. Any non-VSAM and non-SMS dataset can be catalogued twice or multiple 
> times. Reason is obvious: there is no backward reference. It is just entry in 
> BCS, which contains DSN, UNIT and VOLSER.
> 2. VSAM datasets *cannot* be catalogued multiple times. And there is a way to 
> enforce it - VVDS.
> 3. IBM created exceptions for the 2. but only for SYS1 and PAGE HLQ.
> Note - this is matter or HLQ, not VSAM type or flavour. In other words one 
> can "multi-catalog" any SYS1.VSAM.DSN regardless of its purpose and any 
> PAGE.VSAM.DSN, also regardless of its purpose.
> 4. Page dataset is specific kind of VSAM, because it is somehow formatted 
> before use. As one may know DEF PAGE takes significantly more time than 
> regular DEF CL and depends on its size.
> 5. So, it is still possible to have good reason to create some page datasets, 
> even cataloged in UCAT, but for future use. And future use will require page 
> datasets to be in MCAT. How? a) recatalog. b) my current UCAT is de facto 
> other system's MCAT. Other scenarios may apply.
>
>
> My €0.02
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to