Sri h Kolusu suggest the INCLUDE; I assume that he tested it. IMHO file tailoring is a more versatile solution.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 11:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: How to configure using PDS members in JCL. On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:22:42 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >CPPUPDTE (nee IPOUPDTE) only changes a existing member; the easiest ways I >can think of to do what you want are ISPF file tailoring or JCL substitution >with a // INCLUDE. I would probably go with the former. > Oh my! Can an INCLUDE statement be embedded in instream data, or is it a terminator like other JCL statements? I suppose concatenation is your friend. Should such a JCLLIB member begin with // DD DATA,SYMBOLS=JCLONLY and end with /*? Is there a necessary and valuable example in the Ref. or SAMPLIB? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
