Bitsavers has IBM System/360 Operating System Control program Services, dated April, 1968. STIMER is in page 108. TASK and REAL are both there, as are exit and wait. Does that count as "always"?
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/os/R01-08/C28-6541-1_Control_Program_Services_Apr66.pdf -- Tom Marchant On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:55:12 +0000, Schmitt, Michael <[email protected]> wrote: >In IMS Transaction Manager you can define a PROCLIM for each transaction, with >a count and/or CPU-time-per-transaction, aka the "processing limit count >time". The manual says: > >This is the amount of time (for non-Fast-Path transactions, in seconds; for >Fast Path transactions, in hundredths of seconds) allowable to process a all >messages for a given transaction during a single schedule. The number >specifies the maximum CPU time allowed for each message to be processed in the >message processing region. The value is a number that can range from 1 to 65 >535. Specifying the maximum value means that no time limit is placed on the >application program. > >When a transaction exceeds the limit IMS abends it with a U0240: "a message >processing program exceeded the allowable execution time." > >I swear that it used to be that the calling chain of every U0240 ended in the >application calling IMS, e.g. a DLI call via CBLTDLI or equivalent. That >implied that the way it worked was: > > > * IMS saves the transaction's CPU time at the start of the transaction (or > perhaps when the application retrieved its input message). > * Whenever the application called IMS, IMS would compute the CPU time used > so far and compare it to the process limit. > >But now I see U0240's are the result of an interrupt, which can hit anywhere. >For example, if the application was in it's own code when the time runs out, >the interrupt fires and IMS then abends with the U0240. > >What I'm wondering is, why the change? > >I'm guessing the way it is working now is IMS is setting an STIMER TASK with >an exit, which measures a 'task-time interval', measured by the CPU timer only >while the task is in execution. > >Was that not always an option? > >______________________________________________ >Michael Schmitt | DXC Apps Development | MassMutual ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
