I’m assuming that when STSI was enhanced for z16 – and it was a great enhancement – all the ways of calling it were able to support the new information (and any environmentals).
Cheers, Martin From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Attila Fogarasi <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, 3 February 2024 at 05:26 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Difference between STSI instruction and SYSEVENT QVS? substantially the same in terms of information, also don't forget there is also CSRSI which may be a better choice. The callable services validate parameters before calling STSI for you under the covers, also simplify some of the returned info if you are running other than directly lpar on z hardware. On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 6:23 AM Joe Monk <[email protected]> wrote: > What (if any) is the difference between the STSI instruction and the > SYSEVENT QVS service, other than maybe the C interface? > > Thanks, > > Joe > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless otherwise stated above: IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
