On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:32:26 -0600, Joe DeChirico wrote:
>
>Thanks for all the responses, it appears that there was garbage in included
>module, once I removed if from inline and used a ++MOD(VSHMNTSK)
>TXLIB(ZPROTOBJ) . the problem went away.
>
I'm surprised that makes a difference?
How did you build the JCL with instream ++MOD? Could the
binary data have been corrupted by that process?
Does RECEIVE verify instream ++MOD elements?
What were the messages in the failing case?
//SMPPTFIN DD DATA,DLM=@@
the DLM=@@ should have no effect with your data.
What happens if you include the binary by concatenation
rather than instream?
--
gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
