I did zBNA study for few environments and every time I see increase (or very small decrease) in CPU seconds usage. I see big difference in IO delta and considerable saving in DASD storage but not much difference in CPU time? Or zBNA includes only batch jobs and no other beneficiary started tasks like HSM, CICS, DB2 etc
Thank you, Prashant -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Glenn Wilcock Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 2:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Anyone exploiting ZEDC? DFSMShsm is an excellent use case for zEDC and is our number one best practice for HSM. When enabled, DSS zEDC compresses all blocks of data passed to HSM during Migration and Backup. Because HSM is processing fewer data blocks, both cpu and elapsed time are reduced. When going to ML1, the amount of storage is also significantly reduced. Glenn Wilcock, DFSMS Chief Product Owner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN