On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:53:37 -0500, Dana Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote:

>Thanks Mark for the tips.  I'm going back and re-double checking everything on 
>your list.  but see below....
>
>>
>>2) CTPROC listing + logon clist listing
>>
>
>Thats puzzling me, where it's getting that from.  CTPROC is not specified as a 
>logon proc,  it's not even a logon proc and has nothing remotely to do with 
>TSO:
> 
>//CTPROC PROC                                                           
>//*                                                                     
>//* DOC:    THIS PROCEDURE IS THE IPCS CTRACE1 EXTERNAL WRITER PROCEDURE
>//*         USED BY TCP/IP   .                                          
>//*                                                                     
>//IEFPROC  EXEC  PGM=ITTTRCWR,REGION=0K,TIME=1440                       
>//* TIME=1440 TO PREVENT S322 ABENDS                                    
>//TRCOUT01 DD DSNAME=DMITCHE.TCPIP.PKTRACE,                             
>//             DISP=SHR                                                 
>//                                                                      
>

Ok.. ignore that.   Not sure where this behavior is documented but it has
to do with either the first or last thing that ran as SUB=MSTR (honestly,
I've never paid much attention to this "anomaly".  
 

>
>Yes it is a one time deal.  If the job to define the new user is ran on either 
>system 1 or 2,  same thing happens.  Logon fails on 2 first, successful on 1.
>

Set a slip also for the 213 abend with A=SVCD so you have a dump.   

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS       
mailto:[email protected]                                        
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html 
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to