Thank you. Have you tried PREPROCESS/PREPROCESSED?
My testing doesn't show gains (bracketing with TIMEUSED LINKAGE=SYSTEM) On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:57:13 +0000 Rob Scott <[email protected]> wrote: :>I have been using ASAXWC for over 20 years in multiple products and it has been rock solid. Never noticed a performance hit, although I do bypass it for "*" and "**" patterns. :> :>Rob Scott :>Rocket Software :> :>Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> :>________________________________ :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> :>Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2024 8:33:08 AM :>To: [email protected] <[email protected]> :>Subject: Re: Comments on ASAXWC? :> :>EXTERNAL EMAIL :> :> :> :> :>On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 01:55:22 -0500 Willy Jensen <[email protected]> :>wrote: :> :>:>I cannot comment on the PASN<>HASN issue, but I have written an assembler subroutine which is faster than ASAXWC. I also have a REXX subroutine which I use in public domain REXXs where I cannot rely on the user being able or allowed to install an assembler module. :> :>I have been thinking about patterns and it looks like it may take several :>passes. :> :>For example, pattern *CD*Q :> :>To match ABCDGQCDQ :> :>Would take multiple passes :> :>Scan for CD, match, scan for Q, match, fail since trailing characters :> :>So would need to start again looking for another CD, etc. Or perhaps first :>scan for another Q? Etc. :> :>Logic would seem to chop off the start/end if not masked, and keep looping :>until either match or no possibility. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
