On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 at 14:27, Binyamin Dissen < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:06:06 -0400 Tony Harminc <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] Don't see why a relative instruction should care about ARs. > The "relative" part of the instruction has to do with the target address, not the result. But I agree there's little point to it, since it would always be loading the AR with 0. LAEY allows addressibility before the base register and beyond 4K. > Fair enough. But we're not getting to "baseless" code. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
