No Language Environment issues? On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 17:04, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
> As long as the program doesn't require a different environment, you should > be fine unless you run out of storage. > > If the program was written to assume that it is running from the first RB > or under the jobstep TCB, then there may be issues. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf > of Steff Gladstone <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 9:53 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: SVC calling (via SYNCH) a 3GL program > > Caution: This email did not originate from George Mason’s mail system. Do > not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. > > > I hope the following question does not offend the ears (eyes?) of assembler > purists. > > Can an SVC call a 3GL program (e.g. COBOL) using the SYNCH macro? Or must > the entire code be pure assembler? We have some fairly complex code > already written as a COBOL subroutine and were hoping to recycle it within > the context of the SVC. > > Thanks, > Steff Gladstone > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
