Guys, It also helps when the customer uses the right for example,LE run options. We run data(31) all31(on) and had a customer tell e we should run below the line ...I absolutely could believe it.....it's not always us developers...sometimes it's plain ignorance for lack of better terms about z/OS or the system in general .....
Scott ford www.identityforge.com from my IPAD 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means' On May 31, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/31/2013 7:11 AM, Jan Vanbrabant wrote: >> Till now, the application programs are RE-COMPILED in each environment; >> this in order to avoid the slightest problem. For example: >> >> · Runtime LE 1.13 in development and runtime LE 1.12 in production >> MIGHT possibly generate a different behavior if the applications were not >> recompiled >> >> · A program compiled with the highest PL/1 version and executing >> with a too low LE might also have problems. > > I always thought the big benefit to recompiling was to allow the use of the > latest instructions and system services. If the charts presented by the > compiler developers are to be believed, recompiling can have tremendous > positive performance impacts, especially when transitioning from one hardware > generation to another. If they stop recompiling their applications, and just > carry things forward using a copy approach, then their applications might > begin to "slow down" (relatively speaking) whenever their systems are > upgraded. > > -- > Edward E Jaffe > Phoenix Software International, Inc > 831 Parkview Drive North > El Segundo, CA 90245 > http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
