That is what I was looking for, SMSPDSE/SMSPDSE1.
"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." Bugs Bunny Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Friday, January 17th, 2025 at 10:22 AM, Radoslaw Skorupka <[email protected]> wrote: > In a nutshell: use PDSE, not PDS and that's all. > > We can mention VLF, LLA, DLF, Hiperbatch, BLSR and maybe some ISV > products, but IMHO none of them could help in your scenario. > > Why PDSE > Better directory search > Caching (that's why it's broken when shared outside of sysplex boundaries) > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > W dniu 16.01.2025 o 21:27, rpinion865 pisze: > > > I am sure I know the answer. But in case something was introduced in the > > last few years, is there a facility that would cache > > in memory a library (PDS/PDSE), directory and members? This would be a > > library NOT covered by the COFVLFxx Classes. > > Looking at DASD statistics for our BMC CTx product libraries, I see that > > the CTx parmlib dataset gets hundreds of thousands of > > batch job hits, with millions of I/O to the library. The DASD controller > > cache hit percent is 97. But the best and fastest I/O is no > > I/O. > > > > Did Batch LSR support libraries and does anyone still use BLSR? > > > > "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > > > > Bugs Bunny > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
