UTS was (is) ASCII
On 1/22/25 6:39 PM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Wow, I'd forgotten that one! Are you sure it was ASCII? I don't remember and Googling hasn't really helped. I did find references to needing a Series/1 to drive the terminals, but it could have been translating? What about UTS? I think that was EBCDIC but, again, can't quite remember. Soooo much effort wasted on so many things... -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2025 5:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OMVS Well, if you don't count the AT&T version that ran under TSS, there wer VM/IX and IX/370. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
-- -- R; <>< ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
