No. I can do that tomorrow. I just wanted to test whether step 2 was the root cause of the enqueue being active during the execution of step 1.
Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected] On Tuesday, February 18th, 2025 at 7:58 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:28:24 +0000, Mark Jacobs wrote: > > > True, but not in the test case I used to verify that the problem exists in > > the simplest way I could think of. > > > > Step 1. A user written program that issues the wait SVC without the ECB > > ever being posted. > > Step 2. PGM=IEFBR14 with a dataset allocated DISP=SHR > > > > A D GRS command verified that the enqueue was held by this job while it was > > waiting in step 1. > > > Did your test Step 1 reproduce the problem by issuing a DYNALLOC > which failed with an ENQ conflict? (You didn't say or show code.) > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
