On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, at 16:57, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote: > So, what's the problem with keeping some tech LPAR up and running? > It does consume very few CPU cycles, few memory, same disk space.
If this "tech LPAR" is specifcially limited to emergency use that might be ok, but where I worked the sysprog LPARs had no access to any of the disks used by live systems - so I can't see how one could use such an LPAR to fix anything. -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
