It is arguable that this (the IBM win, and related) is counter
productive. (But try to convince IBM exec/legal of it.)
Since the exit of other vendors from the mainframe hardware market,
industry interest in that architecture has waned.
Meanwhile, other processor architectures, with less original capability,
have gained traction.
It's sad that the "almost good enough" is the comfort zone of the
masses, but Big Blue continues to force out other interested parties
like a dictator.
-- R; <><
On 3/10/25 11:37 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Various articles, most of which basically add no more detail than my Subject:
line;
https://www.silicon.co.uk/e-regulation/legal/ibm-wins-lawsuit-against-lzlabs-over-mainframe-patents-603173
has the most.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
-- R; <><
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
