On Sun, 11 May 2025 06:37:56 +0000, Farley, Peter <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>Thanks Linda for the response and the idea for a work-around.
>
>On a slightly different subject, is it true (as I read elsewhere) that the new 
>clang-based C/C++ compiler has no listing options at all?  How in the world 
>are programmers supposed to debug production abends without at the very least 
>a full LIST and XREF section of the compiler output?  I realize that the open 
>systems world depends on source debuggers and XREF-generators separate from 
>the compiler and other such separate utilities, but when programs abend on 
>z/OS we need these listing artifacts to analyze the root cause after the 
>abend, which cannot be done in a live debug session in production – that just 
>will not be allowed to happen in any responsible commercial shop.
>
>I suppose if there were a separate utility to produce an accurate LIST 
>artifact from the compiled object code that MIGHT be enough, but ISTM that 
>adds unnecessarily separate steps to the program preparation process.
>
>Peter
>

hi Peter,


Yes, we are aware listings are very useful for a number of cases like what you 
mentioned. We’re currently evaluating how best to support solving problems in 
this area.


Regards,
z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Team

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to