Hi,
Is it absolutely necessary for SysProgs running SMP/e Jobs with USS
Maintenance to have UID(0)?
One reason I can think of is that the new files need to be owned by
UID(0)/GID(0). Another is that since "System" Directories (e.g. /usr)
are owned by UID(0)/GID(0), the new files cannot be placed there due to
the existing permission bits.)
Please confirm/deny my reasoning.
Thank you in advance.
David
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
