On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 23:14:38 +0100, Rupert Reynolds wrote: > >MegaMathics in decimal I'd already done years ago, including trig, logs, >etc. > I'd imagine it would be a challenge to support Rexx's unlimited precision. Truncated Taylor series would work, but performance would be abysmal. I suspect that's the reason Rexx lacks an elementary functions library.
>This all started because I wanted typed Rexx with (what I call) >conventional scoping. My middle name is Underestimator :-) > PROCEDURE EXPOSE does some of that, but statically nested functions are missing. what I miss most are ITERATE and LEAVE naming a variable exposed from a calling function. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
