On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:55:24 +0000, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>You haven't got a clue as to what I understand; you've made that abundantly >clear. I'm only asking you to be on topic and not dismiss my knowledge and experience as "nonsense". This is a discussion about porting OOREXX without losing functionality and why IBM will not be porting it because everything the original developers need is already available in TSO. One of the complaints about REXX is that calling a REXX exec creates a unique instance of the exec. From OOREXX, you can make calls to ISPEXEC the underlying logic using ISPEXEC calls but will lose access to the OOREXX objects and variables. What value does OOREXX provide when it is more suitable as a batch job instead of TSO scripting language? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
