Yes on all of these. I misspoke. I am processing SMF data. On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 11:25 AM Michael Oujesky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 89 is not a RMF record, so ERBSMFR will never map it. Use IFASMFR > for 89 mapping. > > At 09:37 AM 6/30/2025, Mark Pace wrote: > > >I have been reading and listing out information in SMF type 73 records. > >Now I want some information for type 89. But I'm having problems getting > >the map for type 89. > > > >I use > >ERBSMFR (73,89) > > > >The 73 map shows up, but I get an error on 89. > >** ASMA254I *** MNOTE *** 1098+ 4,89 INVALID RECORD TYPE > >SPECIFIED > > > >In the maco messages > > > >*For SMF Records 78 and 89 additional switchesIFAR78X, resp. * > > > >*How do you set a switch? * > > > > > > > >-- > >The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent > >Mainline's positions or opinions > > > >Mark D Pace > >Senior Systems Engineer > >Mainline Information Systems > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent Mainline’s positions or opinions Mark D Pace Senior Systems Engineer Mainline Information Systems ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
