On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 19:05:51 -0400, Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote: >Ya know, I remember hearing "There's an old version of Pipelines hiding in >that BatchPipes" back in the day. This suggests that you're both sort of right >(René "more righter"): it was there but not obvious, and thus is perhaps not a >good example of folks using/opting not to use Pipes.
It's confusing to talk about because it's two separate, disparate pieces: BatchPipes is the pipeline connecting different jobs--and/or systems? I've never had access to play with that piece and know nothing about it. BatchPipeWorks is CMS/TSO Pipelines level 1109001A included with BatchPipes. ¬R ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
