+1 Thanks Robert. I voted for yours. They really should support both languages via a common LE function, but I'll take whatever we can get.
Peter From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Robert Prins Sent: Monday, December 29, 2025 7:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Idea to provide HLL's access to their own SERVICE string +1 And added a copy for PL/I, so vote for that one too: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ideas.ibm.com/ideas/PLIVUE-I-404__;!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!O4Ya4_0IZbYMAmP-Tck54VKD_H3uXQw4N-PP0SCY-fJzHwPd9G2HVQ49Oguc7rBFThBaknmv9Tvscv07lkNeR5QdgagHtacSVzZKu-0y$ Robert On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 at 08:24, Farley, Peter < mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > I have submitted an Idea to IBM to provide a method for an HLL (only COBOL > and PL/I currently qualify) to retrieve at execution time the SERVICE > string stored inside the running code. > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ideas.ibm.com/ideas/COBOLVUE-I-426__;!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!O4Ya4_0IZbYMAmP-Tck54VKD_H3uXQw4N-PP0SCY-fJzHwPd9G2HVQ49Oguc7rBFThBaknmv9Tvscv07lkNeR5QdgagHtacSV8FIdULe$ > > Please vote this up if you can. > > Peter -- This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
