That would be overkill for our purposes, I think. We'll see; we haven't used it 
in anger yet. What I think I want (and am currently generating) is something 
like:

======================================================================== 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--PHS.PHSG1.JOB00950.D0000002.JESMSGLG----------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1                       J E S 2  J O B  L O G  --  S Y S T E M  S 0 W 1 
0                                                                       
 13.58.25 JOB00950 ---- FRIDAY,    09 JAN 2026 ----                     
 13.58.25 JOB00950  IRR010I  USERID PHS      IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB.   
 13.58.25 JOB00950  IEFC452I PHSG1 - JOB NOT RUN - JCL ERROR  716       
0------ JES2 JOB STATISTICS ------                                      
0           19 CARDS READ                                               
0           35 SYSOUT PRINT RECORDS                                     
0            0 SYSOUT PUNCH RECORDS                                     
0            2 SYSOUT SPOOL KBYTES                                      
0         0.00 MINUTES EXECUTION TIME                                   
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--PHS.PHSG1.JOB00950.D0000003.JESJCL------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        1 //PHSG1  JOB  MSGLEVEL=(1,1),MSGCLASS=H 
(etc.)

The line of equals signs will separate *jobs* in the file: my tool lets you 
tell it whether to append or not. Again, not clear we need that. Yet.

This will at least be better than the nothing we have now; we'll see if it's 
good enough. We have a lot of failures due to transient issues (typically 
networking between our hosted z/OS system and our internal servers), and those 
should be clearer, at a minimum.
                  
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2026 11:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SDSF / ISFEXEC / ISFACT question

On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:36:29 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>    ...
>This EXEC will let us save the job output before deleting it. FFDC, what a 
>concept!
> 
How do you deal with various attributes among the numerous spool data sets 
which constitute a job?

I could imagine writing each spool data set to a separate PS data set and 
building an index file to identify them..

--
gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to