I don't know of any way to do it in TSO/E REXX. RXFunc is very useful in the interpreters that support it.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Charles Mills <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2026 1:57 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Idea received: Provide a mechanism to dynamically load and unload a REXX function package External Message: Use Caution Do you "like" RxFuncAdd? Would it in your opinion be a good model for me to follow? Charles On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 18:10:01 +0000, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: >FYI. Prompted by te CEEPIPI thread. > > >-- >Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי >נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > > > >________________________________________ >From: IBM Z Hardware Ideas Portal <[email protected]> >Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2026 1:08 PM >To: Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> >Subject: Idea received: Provide a mechanism to dynamically load and unload a >REXX function package > >External Message: Use Caution [X] Thank you for submitting your idea: >ZOS-I-4797 Provide a mechanism to dynamically load and unload a REXX function >packageCustomers with multiple REXX-callable functions shared across >scripts.The OS/2 REXX interpreters include a RxUtil function that supports a >RxFuncAdd operation. Porting it to TSO/E would be one way to implement >this.View idea You're receiving notifications because you created this idea. >[X] [X] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
