More bad news. Across the tech industry, workers are watching as stock prices 
balloon and AI startups soar to monster valuations while employers are 
simultaneously cutting head count due to the rapidly emerging power of AI. So 
far in 2026, there have been almost 110,000 layoffs at 137 tech companies, 
according to Layoffs.fyi, after roughly 125,000 cuts all last year.At the 
current pace, cuts could approach the peak in 2023, when there were more than 
260,000 layoffs, as many software and digital media companies rightsized 
following the Covid hiring boom. Replaced by machines’Umesh Ramakrishnan, chief 
strategy officer at executive search firm Kingsley Gate, said the current trend 
of AI taking jobs is hard for workers, but welcomed by investors.“It’s easy to 
tell somebody, ‘Hey, listen, I made a mistake by hiring more people than I 
should have,’” Ramakrishnan said. “Now the world understands that jobs are 
being replaced by machines, and if you’re not doing that, shareholders are 
getting upset.”Cisco is the latest tech giant to make such an announcement, 
telling investors alongside quarterly earnings last week that it was 
eliminating fewer than 4,000 jobs.“The companies that will win in the AI era 
will be those with focus, urgency, and the discipline to continuously shift 
investment toward the areas where demand and long-term value creation are 
strongest,” Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins wrote in a blog post, titled “Our path 
forward.”Cisco shares popped more than 13% on Thursday, their best day since 
2011, after the company reported better-than-expected results and lifted its AI 
infrastructure guidance. Wall Street still isn’t sold on Meta’s story, but 
that’s mostly because the company’s AI strategy has been scattered and remains 
largely in flux. The stock is down about 7% so far this year and almost 5% over 
the past 12 months, underperforming all of its megacap peers other than 
Microsoft.Whatever anxiety investors are experiencing, the feelings inside the 
company are more intense, with some longtime staffers questioning Meta’s AI 
pursuits under AI chief Alexandr Wang, while also weighing if now is the time 
to leave for opportunities at other companies in the AI race, according to 
current and former employees.Data aggregated by Blind, an anonymous 
professional network that requires users to verify their employment with a work 
email address, reveals some of the internal malaise.Meta’s overall rating by 
employees on Blind has declined 25% from a peak in the second quarter of 2024 
to the current period, with a 39% drop in its culture rating. In every category 
other than compensation, Meta has seen a ratings decline and dramatically 
underperforms rivals Amazon, Google and Netflix, the Blind data reveals.The 
company’s full-court press with AI included the recent debut of an employee 
tracking tool intended to collect data from staffers’ actions, such as mouse 
movements and keystrokes on their work computers. The Model Capability 
Initiative, or MCI, as it’s called, is part of Meta’s efforts to train AI 
models to power digital agents that can perform various coding and white-collar 
tasks.Employees have characterized the data tracking tool as “dystopian,” 
according to messages viewed by CNBC, with some workers expressing fear that 
personal information could be leaked. Some Meta workers have noted that their 
workplace computers appear slower since the company initiated the project, 
adding to their frustration, sources said.Meta workers responded by creating an 
online petition that urges Zuckerberg and leadership to shutter the 
project.“Collecting and repurposing this kind of data raises serious concerns 
around privacy, consent, and trust in the workplace,” the petition says. “It 
should not be the norm that companies of any size are permitted to exploit 
their employees by nonconsensually extracting their data for the purposes of AI 
training.”Leo Boussioux, an assistant professor of information systems at the 
University of Washington’s Foster School of Business, described Meta as one of 
many companies currently overhauling its workforce and operations to 
accommodate “the fact that AI is changing the way we work.”Boussioux said one 
goal could be to increase fear or pressure, using AI-related threats and 
layoffs as a “form of weapon to enable a culture change.” But, he said, it 
could also reflect “poor management that does not know how to enable this in a 
more comfortable way for the employees.”CNBC


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Saturday, May 16, 2026, 1:32 PM, Dick Williams 
<[email protected]> wrote:

I also give tens of thousands to charity. Much of it to teachers on X. 
(Twitter) There’s a rather large group of teachers who post their Amazon 
wishlist which I have been donating to going on 3 years now. @SenateTim for 
those who think I’m lying. BlueSky too. @senatetim.bluesky.social I also give 
thousands to local animal charities. 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Saturday, May 16, 2026, 1:22 PM, Dick Williams 
<[email protected]> wrote:

I invest my profits in worldwide travel. Iceland & Norway soon.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Saturday, May 16, 2026, 9:20 AM, Michael Watkins 
<[email protected]> wrote:

You're the odd bird that thrives on disapproval, i.e. a troll. Ask yourself: 
Does their disapproval make me feel superior? Why do I waste my time on these 
a-holes and that idiot Darren? Time to invest your Nvidia profits in a shrink 
before your mind depreciates even more.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Dick Williams
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2026 11:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Dick

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Texas Comptroller's email 
system.
DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you expect them from the sender 
and know the content is safe.

Amazing how the a holes here can call me names without the idiot Darren saying 
anything. But no doubt this posting will be met with his usual reaction for me.

On Friday, May 15, 2026, 1:15 PM, Michael Watkins 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Nature, nurture or Dick by choice?

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Tony Newman
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2026 12:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Dick

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Texas Comptroller's email 
system.
DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you expect them from the sender 
and know the content is safe.

Dick by name, Dick by nature!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to