I prefer to have sequence number.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Richard Zierdt <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2026 4:19 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Assembly: ICTL 1,79,16 External Message: Use Caution Anyone using ICTL in assembly language? ICTL 1,79,16 moves the continuation column to 80, allowing more "free form" coding, leaving more room for comments, and not having to worry about where that pesky column 72 is, which is effectively moved to column 80 where it's easier to see and code for when necessary. When a macro is invoked, the assembler mixes "traditional" code with a "non-standard" ICTL directive. Yeah, 73-80 was for sequence numbers, but I haven't dropped a deck of cards for some time now. Richard Zierdt Confidentiality Warning/Avertissement de confidentialité: This message is intended only for the named recipients. This message may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the named recipient, its employee or its agent, please notify us immediately and permanently destroy this message and any copies you may have. Ce message est destiné uniquement aux destinataires dûment nommés. Il peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire dûment nommé, son employé ou son mandataire, veuillez nous aviser sans tarder et supprimer ce message ainsi que toute copie qui peut en avoir été faite. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
