> I'm wondering if CEE05101x and CEE5101x aren't the same animal. When is a > leading zero significant? I don't see any CEE messages with more than 4 > digits.
The 'reason code' explanation of u4080 explicitly says that the last digit is supposed to be ignored and only the 4 characters following the prefix CEE are supposed to translate into the LE message. > I dearly wish LE (C/C++) return value/reason codes were documented with their > numeric values, instead of having to relate a header file to a member in > SCEEH.H and work it out for yourself... The reason I don't believe that a BPX1MSS call is the culprit is simply the LE traceback. This is deep within LE itself, and I cannot even relate it to our code calling either BPX1MSS or another LE rumtine service. Besides, I severely doubt that *our* code even sets condition handlers. The one throwing the dump is CEEMMSG - so I guess it attempts to write out a message and cannot find that message, hence the dump. It would not be the first time that something related to the CEA launcher is incompletely or not at all documented. And we might have stumbled across a bug that we cannot even report to IBM (RDT-licence does not include bug reports). Barbara ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
