In <51ca273b....@aim.com>, on 06/25/2013 at 05:26 PM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> said:
>BTW, I am exceedingly unhappy with the "200" status codes from the >last two SITE commands, but IBM has some twisted logic according to >whichthe behavior is proper. WTF? It's not in accordance with RFC 959. 200 Command okay. 500 Syntax error, command unrecognized. 501 Syntax error in parameters or arguments. >From a more rational (Solaris) server: Also broken. > 500 /dev/null: not a plain file. Should be 501 /dev/null: not a plain file. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN