In <[email protected]>, on 06/25/2013
at 05:26 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>BTW, I am exceedingly unhappy with the "200" status codes from the
>last two SITE commands, but IBM has some twisted logic according to
>whichthe behavior is proper.
WTF? It's not in accordance with RFC 959.
200 Command okay.
500 Syntax error, command unrecognized.
501 Syntax error in parameters or arguments.
>From a more rational (Solaris) server:
Also broken.
> 500 /dev/null: not a plain file.
Should be
501 /dev/null: not a plain file.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
