On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:19:05 +0800, David Crayford wrote: >One thing you missed is the little known syntax of defining a pointer to >an array of fixed type lengths. > >char (*array)[8]; > Ugh! I need to retrain myself every time I need to know that.
>On 1/07/2013 8:01 PM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote: >> >> The compiler can immediately change every reference of the form >> >> p[n] >> >> to >> >> *(p + n) >> Or even to n[p], because addition is commutative. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
