Darth Keller wrote: >Well, this gets more interesting as it appears that there must be some >automation in place as I'm only seeing the IGD010*I (* = 07, 08, 09, & 10) on >2 of my 4 production LPAR's.
More reasons for a SHARE requirement! >Are you sure your messages are not being suppressed? I am sure they are not suppressed after looking in all my MPFLSTxx and my automation suppression lists. >I still think the SHARE requirement would be valid as I want to see ALL the >messages in the log - batch, TSO, etc. Agreed! But take in account that different macros are using to place a message on batch (WTO), TSO (TPUT), etc. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
